Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.
Identifieur interne : 000516 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000515; suivant : 000517Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.
Auteurs : I A Pretty [Royaume-Uni] ; D. SweetSource :
- Journal of forensic sciences [ 0022-1198 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Aire sous la courbe (MeSH), Animaux (MeSH), Biais de l'observateur (MeSH), Courbe ROC (MeSH), Dentistes (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Morsures humaines (anatomopathologie), Odontologie légale (enseignement et éducation), Odontologie légale (législation et jurisprudence), Odontologie légale (méthodes), Odontologie légale (normes), Répartition aléatoire (MeSH), Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH), Suidae (MeSH).
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Morsures humaines.
- enseignement et éducation : Odontologie légale.
- législation et jurisprudence : Odontologie légale.
- méthodes : Odontologie légale.
- normes : Odontologie légale.
- Aire sous la courbe, Animaux, Biais de l'observateur, Courbe ROC, Dentistes, Humains, Répartition aléatoire, Sensibilité et spécificité, Suidae.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals (MeSH), Area Under Curve (MeSH), Bites, Human (pathology), Dentists (MeSH), Forensic Dentistry (education), Forensic Dentistry (legislation & jurisprudence), Forensic Dentistry (methods), Forensic Dentistry (standards), Humans (MeSH), Observer Variation (MeSH), ROC Curve (MeSH), Random Allocation (MeSH), Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH), Swine (MeSH).
- MESH :
- education : Forensic Dentistry.
- legislation & jurisprudence : Forensic Dentistry.
- methods : Forensic Dentistry.
- pathology : Bites, Human.
- standards : Forensic Dentistry.
- Animals, Area Under Curve, Dentists, Humans, Observer Variation, ROC Curve, Random Allocation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Swine.
Abstract
U.S. courts have stated that witnesses must be able to identify published works that define operational parameters of any tests or procedures that form the basis of scientific conclusions. Such works do not exist within the field of bite mark analysis. As the most commonly employed analytical technique in bite injury assessment. this study defines quantifiable variables for transparent digital overlays. A series of ten simulated, postmortem bites were created on pigskin and, with accompanying overlays, assembled into cases. Using two separate studies with four examiner groups, the study defined values of intra- and inter-examiner reliability, accuracy. sensitivity, specificity, and error rates for transparent overlays. Methods and statistical treatments from medical decision-making and diagnostic test evaluation were employed. Forced decision models and receiver operating characteristic analyses were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity values are described. and the results are consistent with other dental diagnostic systems. It was concluded that the weak inter-examiner reliability values explain the divergence of odontologists' opinions regarding bite mark identifications often stated in court. The effect of training and experience of the examiners was found to have little effect on the effective use of overlays within this study. The authors conclude that further research is required so that the results of the current study can be placed into context, but this represents a significant first step in establishing the scientific basis for this aspect of forensic dentistry.
PubMed: 11714149
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.</title><author><name sortKey="Pretty, I A" sort="Pretty, I A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="I A" last="Pretty">I A Pretty</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, England. ipretty@liv.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Faculty of Medicine. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sweet, D" sort="Sweet, D" uniqKey="Sweet D" first="D" last="Sweet">D. Sweet</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11714149</idno><idno type="pmid">11714149</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000509</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000509</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000509</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000509</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000509</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.</title><author><name sortKey="Pretty, I A" sort="Pretty, I A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="I A" last="Pretty">I A Pretty</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, England. ipretty@liv.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Faculty of Medicine. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sweet, D" sort="Sweet, D" uniqKey="Sweet D" first="D" last="Sweet">D. Sweet</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of forensic sciences</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno><imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals (MeSH)</term><term>Area Under Curve (MeSH)</term><term>Bites, Human (pathology)</term><term>Dentists (MeSH)</term><term>Forensic Dentistry (education)</term><term>Forensic Dentistry (legislation & jurisprudence)</term><term>Forensic Dentistry (methods)</term><term>Forensic Dentistry (standards)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Observer Variation (MeSH)</term><term>ROC Curve (MeSH)</term><term>Random Allocation (MeSH)</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>Swine (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Aire sous la courbe (MeSH)</term><term>Animaux (MeSH)</term><term>Biais de l'observateur (MeSH)</term><term>Courbe ROC (MeSH)</term><term>Dentistes (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Morsures humaines (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Odontologie légale (enseignement et éducation)</term><term>Odontologie légale (législation et jurisprudence)</term><term>Odontologie légale (méthodes)</term><term>Odontologie légale (normes)</term><term>Répartition aléatoire (MeSH)</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH)</term><term>Suidae (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Morsures humaines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="education" xml:lang="en"><term>Forensic Dentistry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="enseignement et éducation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Odontologie légale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="legislation & jurisprudence" xml:lang="en"><term>Forensic Dentistry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="législation et jurisprudence" xml:lang="fr"><term>Odontologie légale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Forensic Dentistry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Odontologie légale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Odontologie légale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bites, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Forensic Dentistry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Area Under Curve</term><term>Dentists</term><term>Humans</term><term>Observer Variation</term><term>ROC Curve</term><term>Random Allocation</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Swine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Aire sous la courbe</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Biais de l'observateur</term><term>Courbe ROC</term><term>Dentistes</term><term>Humains</term><term>Répartition aléatoire</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term><term>Suidae</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">U.S. courts have stated that witnesses must be able to identify published works that define operational parameters of any tests or procedures that form the basis of scientific conclusions. Such works do not exist within the field of bite mark analysis. As the most commonly employed analytical technique in bite injury assessment. this study defines quantifiable variables for transparent digital overlays. A series of ten simulated, postmortem bites were created on pigskin and, with accompanying overlays, assembled into cases. Using two separate studies with four examiner groups, the study defined values of intra- and inter-examiner reliability, accuracy. sensitivity, specificity, and error rates for transparent overlays. Methods and statistical treatments from medical decision-making and diagnostic test evaluation were employed. Forced decision models and receiver operating characteristic analyses were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity values are described. and the results are consistent with other dental diagnostic systems. It was concluded that the weak inter-examiner reliability values explain the divergence of odontologists' opinions regarding bite mark identifications often stated in court. The effect of training and experience of the examiners was found to have little effect on the effective use of overlays within this study. The authors conclude that further research is required so that the results of the current study can be placed into context, but this represents a significant first step in establishing the scientific basis for this aspect of forensic dentistry.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11714149</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-1198</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>46</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2001</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of forensic sciences</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Forensic Sci</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1385-91</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>U.S. courts have stated that witnesses must be able to identify published works that define operational parameters of any tests or procedures that form the basis of scientific conclusions. Such works do not exist within the field of bite mark analysis. As the most commonly employed analytical technique in bite injury assessment. this study defines quantifiable variables for transparent digital overlays. A series of ten simulated, postmortem bites were created on pigskin and, with accompanying overlays, assembled into cases. Using two separate studies with four examiner groups, the study defined values of intra- and inter-examiner reliability, accuracy. sensitivity, specificity, and error rates for transparent overlays. Methods and statistical treatments from medical decision-making and diagnostic test evaluation were employed. Forced decision models and receiver operating characteristic analyses were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity values are described. and the results are consistent with other dental diagnostic systems. It was concluded that the weak inter-examiner reliability values explain the divergence of odontologists' opinions regarding bite mark identifications often stated in court. The effect of training and experience of the examiners was found to have little effect on the effective use of overlays within this study. The authors conclude that further research is required so that the results of the current study can be placed into context, but this represents a significant first step in establishing the scientific basis for this aspect of forensic dentistry.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pretty</LastName><ForeName>I A</ForeName><Initials>IA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Medicine. Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, England. ipretty@liv.ac.uk</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sweet</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Forensic Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0375370</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-1198</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019540" MajorTopicYN="N">Area Under Curve</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001734" MajorTopicYN="N">Bites, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003815" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentists</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005553" MajorTopicYN="N">Forensic Dentistry</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000193" MajorTopicYN="N">education</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000331" MajorTopicYN="N">legislation & jurisprudence</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015588" MajorTopicYN="N">Observer Variation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012372" MajorTopicYN="N">ROC Curve</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011897" MajorTopicYN="N">Random Allocation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013552" MajorTopicYN="N">Swine</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11714149</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Sweet, D" sort="Sweet, D" uniqKey="Sweet D" first="D" last="Sweet">D. Sweet</name></noCountry><country name="Royaume-Uni"><region name="Angleterre"><name sortKey="Pretty, I A" sort="Pretty, I A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="I A" last="Pretty">I A Pretty</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SuicidDentistV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000516 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000516 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SuicidDentistV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11714149
|texte= Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11714149" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SuicidDentistV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |